I want us to read some passages from a The Chronicle of Higher Education series article called "Why Don't They Apply What They've Learned," Part 1 and Part 2, and then respond to the questions I've posed under each excerpt:
"Ambrose and her co-authors point to two reasons for the failure-to-transfer that all of us see sometimes in our students. First, they might tie whatever knowledge or skill we are teaching too closely to the context in which they learned it. Thus, students can write innovative opening paragraphs in my freshman-composition course, but in their other classes they continue to rely on the same strategies they learned in high school. Second, the inability to transfer a skill or information to a novel context might indicate shallow levels of learning. If students are capable of solving problems, writing essays, or answering questions according to some formula they have learned, they might not have grasped the underlying principles of our course content. Without that deeper knowledge of what lies beneath the formula, they can't pick up what they are learning and put it back down in an unrelated context." [from Part 1]
- How have we, this semester, tried to gain "deeper knowledge of what lies beneath the formula"?
- How do you think you will take the "far transfer" writing and thinking we have don't this semester to your future?
- Can you give me a few examples?
...
- One of our core messages: failure is part of growth.
- How do you deal with failure--what are some of the things you do when you fail at things?
- How may you change how you deal with failure going forward, starting this summer?
- What types of questions do you have for your own education? Come up with two, for now.
- How will you try to connect what you learned in our course to other courses?
- Have you already used ideas and texts used in here to discuss work in your other courses?
No comments:
Post a Comment